|
Post by Smithee on Feb 21, 2012 20:28:07 GMT 10
. . . and sorry for my lack of participation, as I mentioned earlier I am quite busy at the moment and I was overly-ambitious when I thought that I would be finished. I am still in the trenches. You have been saying there is evidence since 2010.
|
|
|
Post by Smithee on Feb 21, 2012 20:30:34 GMT 10
We need data to measure.
|
|
|
Post by Smithee on Feb 21, 2012 20:35:46 GMT 10
No, although sometimes called the "learning perpective" Behaviourism is a discipline which limits what it will count as evidence to observable behaviours (excluding any speculative, inner motives). Instincts are among the subjects Behaviorists study. Many behaviourists in psychology have, in practice, seemed to make philosophical claims about what exists, rather than merely to impose methodological restrictions on what they will allow themselves to count as evidence
Anthony Quinton "Behaviourism" in Alan Bullock & Oliver Stallybrass (Editors), 1977, The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought, Fontana (Collins), London, p. 57
|
|
|
Post by brandt on Feb 22, 2012 0:53:19 GMT 10
. . . and sorry for my lack of participation, as I mentioned earlier I am quite busy at the moment and I was overly-ambitious when I thought that I would be finished. I am still in the trenches. You have been saying there is evidence since 2010. Yes, clearly I have been neglecting my duties here and to you. When I have time I will provide one piece of evidence, at least one a week. I will not comment on them but will allow the results to speak for itself.
|
|
|
Post by brandt on Feb 22, 2012 15:22:55 GMT 10
A 14 hour day has interfered with my duties. I will be sleeping soon. I just wanted to make sure that you knew that you were not forgotten. You will get two pieces tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 14, 2013 16:04:50 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 14, 2013 18:26:31 GMT 10
|
|