|
|
Post by Tamrin on Jan 22, 2011 22:26:11 GMT 10
Some of what's out there: |
|
|
|
Post by maximus on Jan 23, 2011 8:50:33 GMT 10
This is nonsense. Reminds me of a certain Stewart Edwards, who knows more about Freemasonry than the entire membership of UGLE. In his own mind, at least.  |
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Jan 23, 2011 11:41:29 GMT 10
Although he clearly has problems, I've got a soft spot for Stewart. In this case I'm more reminded of RH, BC & FT (Father Ted) RH because to me it's a reminder of just how deranged a person can be and still manage to get an audience taking them seriously in cyberspace. If they were ranting such nonsense on a street corner we'd be likely to give them a wide birth  BC because of the meaninglessly wide definition of Freemasonry. I'm pretty sure that, according to the principles Jerd Guillaume-Sam uses to define freemasons, agreeing to the terms and conditions of his blog host (blogspot.com) makes him one  FT because of an espisode where an incoherant madman, the Monkey Priest of Killybashangel, hates priests and his friends conspire to spare him from finding out he's one ("He is not supposed to see his own reflection because he doesn't know he's a priest" ;D). |
|
|
|
Post by maximus on Jan 25, 2011 1:07:36 GMT 10
Stewart means well, just comes across a bit strange. RH actually has made a couple of posts in response to BC over on Foley's extremely boring forum that shows a glimmer of intellect hiding under the pink unicorns and fairies in rat-skin shoes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Azaziel on Jan 25, 2011 5:20:52 GMT 10
Max, Mr Ewards has an agenda, and its quite plain he hates mainstream masonry, if Mr Edwards and Mr Foley weren't supporting charlie, charlie may recieve the professional help he needs
|
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Jan 25, 2011 5:41:33 GMT 10
Charlie! Who's Charlie?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Jan 25, 2011 6:11:55 GMT 10
RH actually has made a couple of posts in response to BC over on Foley's extremely boring forum that shows a glimmer of intellect hiding under the pink unicorns and fairies in rat-skin shoes. Indeed, some kinds of delusional insanity are more associated with high rather than low intelligence. In saying this, I stress that if we all looked to our own mental health, we would all find cause for concern. |
|
|
|
Post by maximus on Jan 25, 2011 7:26:07 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by maximus on Jan 25, 2011 7:27:06 GMT 10
RH actually has made a couple of posts in response to BC over on Foley's extremely boring forum that shows a glimmer of intellect hiding under the pink unicorns and fairies in rat-skin shoes. Indeed, some kinds of delusional insanity are more associated with high rather than low intelligence. In saying this, I stress that if we all looked to our own mental health, we would all find cause for concern. No doubt I'm sure that my spirits would be considered delusional by some.  |
|
|
|
Post by Azaziel on Jan 25, 2011 12:19:26 GMT 10
Indeed, some kinds of delusional insanity are more associated with high rather than low intelligence. In saying this, I stress that if we all looked to our own mental health, we would all find cause for concern. No doubt I'm sure that my spirits would be considered delusional by some. Yeah,but your spirits are in a bottle |
|
