|
Post by Azaziel on Sept 28, 2008 15:37:14 GMT 10
Both creationists and Evolutionists may be right but for different reasons then they think,
Home Sapiens are Silica based and Erectus etc are carbon based, first so called humans or humanlike were plant eaters, no great progress was made until they (we) became meat eaters,
seems to me something more has been going on than we are prepared to admit ( maybe GE ),
and what about Taylors trail in Arizona (USA) where they found Homo Sapiens foot prints with dinosaurs, even the smithsonan institute in Washington confirms dating at 65 million years ago, and this is not unusal, but the experts refuse to budge from their THEORIES.
Regards Terry
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Sept 28, 2008 17:42:45 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Azaziel on Sept 28, 2008 21:31:51 GMT 10
Sorry, I didn't express myself clearly, we ( homo sapiens ) do have silica in us that previous( humans) didnt, we are carbon based but with an addition of silica.
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Sept 28, 2008 22:49:01 GMT 10
We contain most, if not all, elements to some degree, including silica (e.g., in tooth enamel). I would be surprised if we were exceptional in this regard (e.g., diatom "skeletons" are composed of silica).
|
|
|
Post by synchronicity on Oct 1, 2008 20:13:36 GMT 10
Scientifically trained Henry Drummond devoted a great deal of study to the subject. I think the key words here are "hermetically sealed."
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Nov 15, 2008 12:05:21 GMT 10
Creationists make it sound as though a "theory" is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night
Isaac Asimov
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Dec 7, 2008 16:59:11 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Dec 20, 2008 11:55:27 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on Dec 20, 2008 11:57:42 GMT 10
|
|