|
Post by Tamrin on May 20, 2009 7:39:35 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Gaslight on May 20, 2009 13:43:52 GMT 10
Given the controversial, dangerous and even heretical nature of Desaguliers' Code, in its day, only those Brethren open to or deemed to be suitable for assistance toward the solution are likely to have found the key. Among those not privy to the "genuine secrets," whisperings of the importance of the "grove" in the Sanctum Sanctorum appear to have led to dreadful confusion rather than enlightenment, as with the illustration below, featuring a literal grove in the deep darkness of the sanctuary, in which the artist either maintained the deceptive veil or himself failed to penetrate it. Is this comment your own, or taken from MacNulty? I'm guessing it's the former, but wanted to make sure. The trees in the Sanctum Sanctorum certainly make you stop and think. Wasn't it an enclosed space into which only the High Priest could venture, and only at certain times? And as I type this, a dim recollection is flickering in my mind. I read somewhere that, at least in the early days, the SS contained a gross image not altogether unconnected with procreation. Can't for the life of me remember where or when I read that.
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 20, 2009 19:35:32 GMT 10
Given the controversial, dangerous and even heretical nature of Desaguliers' Code, in its day, only those Brethren open to or deemed to be suitable for assistance toward the solution are likely to have found the key. Among those not privy to the "genuine secrets," whisperings of the importance of the "grove" in the Sanctum Sanctorum appear to have led to dreadful confusion rather than enlightenment, as with the illustration below, featuring a literal grove in the deep darkness of the sanctuary, in which the artist either maintained the deceptive veil or himself failed to penetrate it. Is this comment your own, or taken from MacNulty? I'm guessing it's the former, but wanted to make sure.
The trees in the Sanctum Sanctorum certainly make you stop and think. Wasn't it an enclosed space into which only the High Priest could venture, and only at certain times?
And as I type this, a dim recollection is flickering in my mind. I read somewhere that, at least in the early days, the SS contained a gross image not altogether unconnected with procreation. Can't for the life of me remember where or when I read that.They were my own words. While MacNulty's work lends itself to the theory I propose, in my reading of his work, I haven't found him be all that specific, in that direction. As for the tradition of the SS being restricted to the HP, even taking a fundamentalist approach and disregarding the historical and biblical confusion presented in our ritual, we find that restriction would not have been the case prior to the dedication of the temple, when masons would have had to be present, as they are said to have been present during Josiah's repairs. The gross image and "image of jealousy" were hostile, pejorative references to the image or emblem of Asherah (she was associated with abundance or plenty). Consider how many Hindu temples still contain emblems representing the lingam and yoni as objects of pious, even somewhat prudish, veneration.
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 20, 2009 21:52:59 GMT 10
I read somewhere that, at least in the early days, the SS contained a gross image not altogether unconnected with procreation. Apart from the asherim there were also the cherubim which were represented differently in different periods. Turning to Dr. Raphael Patai's The Hebrew Goddess (I highly recommend it), we read (pp.84/5):
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 20, 2009 22:15:16 GMT 10
The corroborating testimony of a hostile witness, the Bible:
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 20, 2009 22:35:52 GMT 10
The gross image and "image of jealousy" were hostile, pejorative references to the image or emblem of Asherah (she was associated with abundance or plenty). Consider how many Hindu temples still contain emblems representing the lingam and yoni as objects of pious, even somewhat prudish, veneration. To give the current Pope his due, I welcomed his first encyclical letter, Deus caritas est, in which he said the love of god ( Agape) had a sensuous aspect ( Eros).
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 21, 2009 7:28:21 GMT 10
Definition of Asherah[/url][/size] Please note the association with the "tree of life" and the, 'Merciful One, who dead to life raises!' prayer.
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 22, 2009 7:11:11 GMT 10
ASHERAH
[Excerpt - Merlin Stone, 1984, Ancient Mirrors of Womanhood: A treasury of goddess and heroine lore from around the world, Beacon Press, Boston, p.119 (emphasis added)]
|
|
|
Post by Tamrin on May 22, 2009 7:22:39 GMT 10
From ancient settlements along the waters, the Tigris, the Euphrates, and the Jordan, Semitic peoples spread across the Levant, often calling upon the Holy Mother as Asherah, Highest Queen... "Highest Queen" or "exceeding queen" is also said to be the import of the Egyptian name "Au Set" (archaically "Ashesh") of the goddess whom the Greeks called "Isis."
|
|
|
Post by Gaslight on May 22, 2009 12:39:03 GMT 10
"Highest Queen" or "exceeding queen" is also said to be the import of the Egyptian name "Au Set" (archaically "Ashesh") of the goddess whom the Greeks called "Isis." I've been reading with interest your recent posts on the Mother Goddess in her various incarnations, but losing track of the connection with your initial idea that Desaguliers deliberately included hints in the ritual that would illustrate religious intolerance. The weight of material you're presenting on the Mother Goddess could be construed as an indication that this was Desaguliers' aim: to remind brethren of the old Mother Goddess religion. The crushing of that religion would be secondary. This is sheer conjecture, but if I had to imagine something hidden away in the Masonic ritual, my first candidate would be references to the Gnostic tradition. This would, in a way, fit in with the overall Masonic emphasis on sets of three, and something that was lost. Not references to Asherah, but to maybe Barbelo or Sophia.
|
|